Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Sensitivity of the Halstead and Wechsler Test Batteries to Brain Damage: Evidence from Reitan's Original Validation Sample

16 references·6 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1993The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation3,415 cited
2004Neuropsychological assessment, 4th ed.1,934 cited
1975Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications1,552 cited
2004Neuropsychological assessment.876 cited
2004Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members818 cited
2016Brain and Intelligence746 cited
1987Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders535 cited
2002From the Binet–Simon to the Wechsler–Bellevue: Tracing the History of Intelligence Testing254 cited
1967Cross-validation of the Halstead-Reitan tests for brain damage.154 cited
1959The comparative effects of brain damage on the halstead impairment index and the wechsler-bellevue scale106 cited
1965Influence of cerebral lesions on psychological test performances of older children.96 cited
1991Assessment of brain impairment with the rey auditory verbal learning test: A comparison with other neuropsychological measures68 cited
1955The Distribution According to Age of A Psychologic Measure Dependent Upon Organic Brain Functions65 cited
1992Factor structure of the Wechsler Memory Scale--Revised within a comprehensive neuropsychological battery.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

49 cited

1985Statistical relationships and discriminative accuracy of the Halstead-Reitan, Luria-Nebraska, and Wechsler IQ scores in the identification of brain damage46 cited

2000FORUM Association Between IQ and Neuropsychological Test Performance: Commentary on Tremont, Hoffman, Scott, and Adams (1998)41 cited

Cited by

2016The Cattell–Horn–Carroll Model of Cognition for Clinical Assessment87 cited
2008Flexible vs. fixed batteries in forensic neuropsychological assessment: Reply to Bigler and Hom17 cited
2010The ‘Obsolescence’ of Assessment Procedures11 cited
2008Commentary on Loring and Larrabee's Reanalysis of Reitan's Original Studies6 cited
2008Response to Russell's (2007) and Hom's (2008) Commentary on “A motion to exclude and the ‘fixed’ versus ‘flexible’ battery in ‘forensic’ neuropsychology”4 cited
2025Would a rose by any other name smell as sweet? Complexity, context, and consequences of neuropsychology performance labels2 cited