Khirbet Qeiyafa in Survey and in Excavations: A Response to Y. Dagan

Yosef Garfınkel · Sa‘ar Ganor

11 citations0/0 files storedTel Aviv

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Ancient Near East History Archaeology and Historical Studies

Abstract

Dagan (2009) recently presented an analysis of the settlement history of Khirbet Qeiyafa based on a survey he conducted at the site. His analysis conflicts with the results obtained by the current Khirbet Qeiyafa excavation project. In this article, we compare the two alternative analyses. In light of this comparison, we consider some of the limitations of surveying as a tool of archaeological investigation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Archaeology of the City: Urban Planning in Ancient Israel and its Social Implications 1912The excavation of Gezer, 1902-1905 and 1907-1909 1951Beginning in Archæology 1952Beginning in archaeology 2000Recensie van Z. Herzog: Archaeology of the city. Urban planning in ancient Israel and its social implications, Tel Aviv, 1997 2009Khirbet Qeiyafa in the Judean Shephelah: Some Considerations

Cited by

2012The Fortifications at Tel Burna: Date, Function and Meaning.2013From Regional Power to Peaceful Neighbour: Philistia in the Iron I-II Transition.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.