SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies for fine‐ and core needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions in otolaryngology journals: A systematic review and analysis
6 references·2 citing·37 second hop
Verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies for fine‐ and core needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions in otolaryngology journals: A systematic review and analysis (2013)Verification bias in diagnostic accuracy …The evidence base of clinical diagnosis : theory and methods of diagnostic research (2009)The evidence base of clinical…STARD Statement: Still Room for Improvement in the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2008)STARD Statement: Still Room f…Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors (2007)Endorsement of the STARD Stat…The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement (2006)The quality of diagnostic acc…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The STARD Statement for Repor…The Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in Cytopathology Studies: Review of 6 Journals (2018)The Use and Misuse of Statist…Verification and classification bias interactions in diagnostic test accuracy studies for fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (2014)Verification and classificati…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. (2009)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review (2008)Reporting the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests: The STARD Initiative 10 Years On (2013)Adherence to Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Medicine Research (2017)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors (2008)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review (2013)STROBE, CONSORT, PRISMA, MOOSE, STARD, SPIRIT, and other guidelines – Overview and application (2024)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Understanding Sources of Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2013)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough (2012)False-positive pathology: improving reproducibility with the next generation of pathologists (2019)Poor statistical reporting: do we have a reason for concern? A narrative review and recommendations (2024)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE (2003)Thinking and Deciding (2006)The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review (2011)Psychiatric Progress and the Assumption of Diagnostic Discrimination (2015)Translation and cultural adaptation of parent-report developmental assessments: Improving rigor in methodology (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited
  • 2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited
  • 2009The evidence base of clinical diagnosis : theory and methods of diagnostic research118 cited
  • 2008STARD Statement: Still Room for Improvement in the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies36 cited
  • 2007Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors34 cited

Cited by

  • 2018The Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in Cytopathology Studies: Review of 6 Journals18 cited
  • 2014Verification and classification bias interactions in diagnostic test accuracy studies for fine‐needle aspiration biopsy9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work