Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

IRT Equating Methods

7 references·8 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems5,010 cited
1951Educational Measurement.1,661 cited
1983Developing a Common Metric in Item Response Theory738 cited
1984Comparison of IRT True-Score and Equipercentile Observed-Score "Equatings"335 cited
1977PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF ITEM CHARACTERISTIC CURVE THEORY*184 cited
1989Comparison of 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐Parameter IRT Models130 cited
1987Problems Related to the Use of Conventional and Item Response Theory Equating Methods in Less Than Optimal Circumstances125 cited

Cited by

2018Qualitative Development and Content Validation of the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep Health Items76 cited
2018Assessing the Quality of Upper-Secondary Vocational Education and Training: Evidence from China63 cited
1997Item Response Theory Models and Testing Practices: Current International Status and Future Directions ٭ ٭Invited paper presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain. ٭Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Research Report No.229. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.54 cited
1998Test Equating: What, Why, How?46 cited
2015Examination of the Effects of Dimensionality on Cognitive Processing in Science: A Computational Modeling Experiment Comparing Online Laboratory Simulations and Serious Educational Games42 cited
2002Use of item response theory to link 3 modules of functional status items from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

40 cited

2001Comparison of Dichotomous and Polytomous Item Response Models in Equating Scores from Tests Composed of Testlets39 cited

2025Leveraging LLM respondents for item evaluation: A psychometric analysis38 cited