SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic maps to support the evidence base in social care
0 references·16 citing·47 second hopsampled
Systematic maps to support the evidence base in social care (2007)Systematic maps to support the evidence b…Fintech research: systematic mapping, classification, and future directions (2024)Fintech research: systematic …Differentiating between mapping reviews and scoping reviews in the evidence synthesis ecosystem (2022)Differentiating between mappi…What are the social outcomes of climate policies? A systematic map and review of the ex-post literature (2020)What are the social outcomes …Systematic map of the literature on carbon lock-in induced by long-lived capital (2020)Systematic map of the literat…Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects (2020)Movements shaping climate fut…Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators (2020)Advancing mental health equal…Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis (2018)Research Weaving: Visualizing…Evidence and gap maps: a comparison of different approaches (2018)Evidence and gap maps: a comp…The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management (2016)The benefits of systematic ma…Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool f…A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)A methodology for systematic …Internalized Homonegativity: A Systematic Mapping Review of Empirical Research (2015)Internalized Homonegativity: …Evidence Gap Maps — A Tool for Promoting Evidence-Informed Policy and Prioritizing Future Research (2013)Evidence Gap Maps — A Tool fo…The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas (2011)The Global Evidence Mapping I…Support workers in social care in England: a scoping study (2010)Support workers in social car…Systematic Reviewing in the Social Sciences: Outcomes and Explanation (2008)Systematic Reviewing in the S…How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) (1997)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Minority Stress and Mental Health in Gay Men (1995)Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. (2003)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Minority stressors and psychological distress in transgender individuals. (2017)A model of intersectional stress and trauma in Asian American sexual and gender minorities. (2018)Unraveling Health Disparities Among Sexual and Gender Minorities: A Commentary on the Persistent Impact of Stigma (2018)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)A systematic map of research exploring the effect of greenspace on mental health (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis (2019)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)The Global competitiveness report, 2006-2007 (2007)Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map (2020)Human mobility behavior in COVID-19: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2021)Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family (2023)Dimensions of Human Development (2002)Most people are not WEIRD (2010)The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it) (2017)Are citizen juries and assemblies on climate change driving democratic climate policymaking? An exploration of two case studies in the UK (2021)Distributional impacts of carbon pricing in developing Asia (2021)A ‘just’ hydrogen economy: A normative energy justice assessment of the hydrogen economy (2022)Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970 (1999)The curse of natural resources (2001)A global boom in hydropower dam construction (2014)Conflicted transitions: Exploring the actors, tactics, and outcomes of social opposition against energy infrastructure (2022)Decolonizing energy justice from the ground up: Political ecology, ontology, and energy landscapes (2022)Demand, Services and Social Aspects of Mitigation (2023)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences783 cited
  • 2016Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas338 cited
  • 2011The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas326 cited
  • 2020Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects320 cited
  • 2018Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis278 cited
  • 2015Internalized Homonegativity: A Systematic Mapping Review of Empirical Research213 cited
  • 2016The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management207 cited
  • 2018Evidence and gap maps: a comparison of different approaches196 cited
  • 2020What are the social outcomes of climate policies? A systematic map and review of the ex-post literature117 cited
  • 2013Evidence Gap Maps — A Tool for Promoting Evidence-Informed Policy and Prioritizing Future Research115 cited
  • 2022Differentiating between mapping reviews and scoping reviews in the evidence synthesis ecosystem111 cited
  • 2020Systematic map of the literature on carbon lock-in induced by long-lived capital72 cited
  • 2024Fintech research: systematic mapping, classification, and future directions59 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators53 cited
  • 2010Support workers in social care in England: a scoping study47 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviewing in the Social Sciences: Outcomes and Explanation33 cited