Articlebronze2008

Irreproducible Results—a Response to Thomson Scientific

51 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of General Physiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

![Graphic][1] ©cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved. Thomson Scientific has posted a response ( [1][2]) to our editorial on the reliability of their impact factor data ([2][3]). In it, they claim that our interpretation of the communication between our office and their Research

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Show me the data

Cited by

2010Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year: The effect of journal self-citations 2015Influence of omitted citations on the bibliometric statistics of the major Manufacturing journals 2013Bibliometric Indicators: Why Do We Need More Than One?2021Time to publish? Turnaround times, acceptance rates, and impact factors of journals in fisheries science 2014The impact factor of a journal is a poor measure of the clinical relevance of its papers 2010El duro peregrinaje de las revistas biomédicas españolas hacia la excelencia: ¿quién nos ayuda? Calidad, impacto y méritos de la investigación 2012Emergency Medicine Journal Impact Factor and Change Compared to Other Medical and Surgical Specialties 2010Some Critical Notes on Citation Metrics and Heterodox Economics

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.