SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A bibliometric study of Video Retrieval Evaluation Benchmarking (TRECVid): A methodological analysis
16 references·2 citing·39 second hop
A bibliometric study of Video Retrieval Evaluation Benchmarking (TRECVid): A methodological analysis (2011)A bibliometric study of Video Retrieval E…Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Op…Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem (2010)Popular and/or prestigious? M…Let's make science metrics more scientific (2010)Let's make science metrics mo…Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Bibliometrics and Citation An…Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Bibliometrics and Citation An…A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar (2009)A comparison of bibliometric …Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)Citation counting, citation r…Bibliometrics to webometrics (2008)Bibliometrics to webometricsA Google Scholar h‐index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business (2008)A Google Scholar h‐index for …Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison…Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Impact of data sources on cit…Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)Citation counts for research …Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006)Earlier Web usage statistics …Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Citation Analysis in Research…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001)Bibliometrics and beyond: som…Visibilidad e impacto de la producción científica de la Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial de la Cujae de Cuba (2003-2012) (2018)Visibilidad e impacto de la p…Not so different after all: Malaysian researchers' cross‐discipline view of quality and trustworthiness in citation practices (2016)Not so different after all: M…Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)The effect of use and access on citations (2005)Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data (2005)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Scopus database: a review (2006)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)CiteSeer (1998)Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions (2021)Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales (1998)ArXiv.org e-print archive (2004)Sleeping Beauties in science (2004)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)The Ortega Hypothesis (1972)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways (2017)Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace (2020)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output12,131 cited
  • 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,493 cited
  • 2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar1,034 cited
  • 2007Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar760 cited
  • 2009Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics680 cited
  • 2010Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research671 cited
  • 2008Bibliometrics to webometrics582 cited
  • 2009Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics541 cited
  • 2006Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact417 cited
  • 2008Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science399 cited
  • 2007Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results366 cited
  • 2010Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem336 cited
  • 2010Let's make science metrics more scientific313 cited
  • 2001Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

288 cited
  • 2008A Google Scholar h‐index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business287 cited
  • 2009A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar234 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Visibilidad e impacto de la producción científica de la Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial de la Cujae de Cuba (2003-2012)7 cited
    • 2016Not so different after all: Malaysian researchers' cross‐discipline view of quality and trustworthiness in citation practices6 cited