Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part I. General Guidance and Tips

Kyung Won Kim · Juneyoung Lee · Sang Hyun Choi · Jimi Huh · Seong Ho Park

330 citations0/0 files storedKorean Journal of Radiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

In the field of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA), the use of systematic review and meta-analyses is steadily increasing. By means of objective evaluation of all available primary studies, these two processes generate an evidence-based systematic summary regarding a specific research topic. The methodology for systematic review and meta-analysis in DTA studies differs from that in therapeutic/interventional studies, and its content is still evolving. Here we review the overall process from a practical standpoint, which may serve as a reference for those who implement these methods.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 330 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews

Cited by

2016Successful Publication of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy 2022Utility of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to Identify Developmental Delay in Children Aged 12 to 60 Months 2022Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology 2019

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.