Cultural Equivalence of Adult Attachment Across Four Ethnic Groups: Factor Structure, Structured Means, and Associations With Negative Mood.

Meifen Wei · Daniel Wayne Russell · Brent S. Mallinckrodt · Robyn A. Zakalik

137 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Counseling Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Cultural Differences and Values

Abstract

This study examined factorial invariance, structured means, and association with negative mood of adult attachment across 4 ethnic groups. Online survey data (N 831) were collected from African American, Asian American, Hispanic American, and Caucasian college students. Results indicated that the factor structure of the Experiences in Close Relationship Scale did not vary across the 4 groups. Asian Americans and perhaps also ( p .051) Hispanic Americans reported greater attachment anxiety, whereas African Americans and Asian Americans reported greater attachment avoidance than did their Caucasian peers. Attachment anxiety was significantly associated with negative mood in every group, although Asian Americans reported a stronger association than their African American and Caucasian peers. The magnitude of the association between attachment avoidance and negative mood was invariant across the groups. In recent years, two sharply differing positions have emerged in a vigorous debate about the cultural universality of attachment theory constructs. Claims for the cultural universality of attachment theory have been made since its early beginnings. Ainsworth conducted her first groundbreaking observational studies of infant– caregiver attachment in Baltimore and rural Uganda (Ainsworth, 1967, 1989; Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978). Similar patterns she observed in both settings became the basis for the claim that attachment theory constructs are culturally universal. Proponents of the cultural universality position emphasize Bowlby’s (1969) assertion that for millions of years, the caregiver– infant attachment system has been crucial for the survival of relatively helpless human offspring, and therefore the attachment system is part of the biological makeup of every member of the

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 137 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1992A power primer.1969Attachment and Loss 1991Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.1999Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications 1998Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample.1998Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview.1998Attachment theory and close relationships

Cited by

2010Development and validation of a Coping with Discrimination Scale: Factor structure, reliability, and validity.2013Cultural variation in adult attachment: The impact of ethnicity, collectivism, and country of origin.2010Adult Attachment, Dependence, Self‐Criticism, and Depressive Symptoms: A Test of a Mediational Model 2011When home isn't a safe haven: Insecure attachment orientations, perceived social support, and PTSD symptoms among Israeli evacuees under missile threat.2017

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.