Allocation of functions between man and machines in automated systems.

Nehemiah Jordan

185 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Information Systems Theories and Implementation Ergonomics and Human Factors

Abstract

Abstract : The report postulates that men are good at doing that which machines are not good at doing and machines are good at doing that which men are not good at doing. Thus men and machines are not comparable, but complementary, and the term 'allocation of tasks to men and machine' becomes meaningless. Rather a task must be done by men and machines.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 185 citations exist upstream.

References

1938The Evolution of Physics 1948THEORY OF THE HUMAN OPERATOR IN CONTROL SYSTEMS 1947THEORY OF THE HUMAN OPERATOR IN CONTROL SYSTEMS 1

Cited by

2001Adaptive Automation: Sharing and Trading of Control 2000Function allocation: algorithm, alchemy or apostasy?2011Why the Fitts list has persisted throughout the history of function allocation 2017Issues in Human–Automation Interaction Modeling: Presumptive Aspects of Frameworks of Types and Levels of Automation 1989The Human Planning and Scheduling Role in Advanced Manufacturing Systems: An Emerging Human Factors Domain 1992Theory and Design of Adaptive Automation in Aviation Systems 1995Influence of Task Demand Characteristics on Workload and Performance 2013Requirements for Effective Function Allocation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.