A COMMENT ON THE DIMENSIONALITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE WOMEN AS MANAGER SCALE (WAMS).

Michael D. Crino · Gerry L. DeSanctis

28 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender Diversity and Inequality Social and Intergroup Psychology Media, Gender, and Advertising

Abstract

The Women as Managers Scale (WAMS), reported to be a measure of stereotypic attitudes toward women in management, has appeared in recent literature as both an independent and a dependent variable. ...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1975A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations 1977Organizational and Personal Correlates of Attitudes Toward Women as Managers 1977Attitudes toward women in management and attributions for their success and failure in a managerial position.1980WOMEN AS MANAGERS: ATTITUDES AND ATTRIBUTIONS FOR PERFORMANCE BY MEN AND WOMEN

Cited by

1985Perceptions of women managers and their communicator competencies 2011A comparative analysis of the attitudes toward women managers in China, Chile, and the USA 1987A comparative study of age-related variation in women's views of a career in management 1983WHEN REASON FAILS: A COMMENT ON THE RELIABILITY AND DIMENSIONALITY OF THE WAMS.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.