Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification

Abstract

Gentrification involves the transition of inner-city neighbourhoods from a status of relative poverty and limited property investment to a state of commodification and reinvestment. This paper reconsiders the role of artists as agents, and aestheticisation as a process, in contributing to gentrification, an argument illustrated with empirical data from Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. Because some poverty neighbourhoods may be candidates for occupation by artists, who value their afford ability and mundane, off-centre status, the study also considers the movement of districts from a position of high cultural capital and low economic capital to a position of steadily rising economic capital. The paper makes extensive use of Bourdieu's conceptualisation of the field of cultural production, including his discussion of the uneasy relations of economic and cultural capitals, the power of the aesthetic disposition to valorise the mundane and the appropriation of cultural capital by market forces. Bourdieu's thinking is extended to the field of gentrification in an account that interprets the enhanced valuation of cultural capital since the 1960s, encouraging spatial proximity by other professionals to the inner-city habitus of the artist. This approach offers some reconciliation to theoretical debates in the gentrification literature about the roles of structure and agency and economic and cultural explanations. It also casts a more critical historical perspective on current writing lauding the rise of the cultural economy and the creative city.

Cite this

David Ley (2003). Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136192

@article{david2003artists,
  title  = {Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification},
  author = {Ley, David},
  year   = {2003},
  journal = {Urban Studies},
  doi    = {10.1080/0042098032000136192}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 852 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by