Concordance among Categorized Groups of Judges

James Beckett · William R. Schucany

14 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Educational Statistics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Probability and Statistical Research Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Abstract

Analyzing the agreement between and within more than two groups of judges is presented in the form of an ANACONDA (Analysis of Concordance) Table. Also, the consensus ranking (for those groups which exhibit some agreement) of the k objects is determined using existing multiple comparison procedures based on Friedman rank sums.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

1973A Rank Test for Two Group Concordance 1978Testing for agreement between two groups of judges 1975Some Properties of a Test for Concordance of Two Groups of Rankings

Cited by

1987The ideal man or woman as described by young adolescents in Iceland and the United States 2009Coefficient of structural concordance and an example of its application: Labour productivity and wages in Slovenia

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.