SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Contribution of Handsearching European General Health Care Journals to the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register
5 references·6 citing·38 second hop
The Contribution of Handsearching European General Health Care Journals to the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2002)The Contribution of Handsearching Europea…Identifying Randomised Trials (2001)Identifying Randomised TrialsSystematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Methodological developments i…Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research (2011)Evaluating meta-ethnography: …The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials (2006)The handsearching of 2 medica…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…How to Find the Studies: The Literature Search (2006)How to Find the Studies: The …Beyond MEDLINE for Literature Searches (2003)Beyond MEDLINE for Literature…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies (2001)Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically (2002)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review (2016)Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis (2017)The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? (2016)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Grey Literature in Meta-Analyses (2003)The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)Medical education trends for future physicians in the era of advanced technology and artificial intelligence: an integrative review (2019)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)USE OF THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE MANAGER IN THE SELECTION OF PRIMARY STUDIES IN INTEGRATIVE REVIEWS (2019)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,312 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 2001Identifying Randomised Trials115 cited

Cited by

  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 2011Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research619 cited
  • 2003Beyond MEDLINE for Literature Searches194 cited
  • 2013Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?118 cited
  • 2006How to Find the Studies: The Literature Search17 cited
  • 2006The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work