No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This article considers some of the issues raised by critics of postmodern analyses of social work. It analyses the ways in which social services departments have changed to a ‘post-fordist’ organizational form and considers the implications for equality policies and anti-oppressive practice. It challenges the view that preserving a more professional approach to social work offers greater opportunities for anti-oppressive practice than the more deprofessionalized approach currently being developed and argues that social workers committed to the principles of anti-oppressive practice can develop new tactics appropriate to the changing organizational context It also argues that postmodernist analyses offer new insights into experiences of power, oppression and inequality. In particular, it stresses the importance of understanding the linkages between broader, political and economic trends and the experiences of individual social workers and service users. Drawing on research in Avon Social Services, it considers the ways in which race equality strategies in community care continue to reduce issues of race and racism to culture and identity. Reflecting critically on anti-oppressive and anti-racist action it argues that the limitations placed on anti-oppressive practice under the postfordist context of community care are unlikely to differ greatly from those felt under previous organizational regimes.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.