Deconstructing the Laws of Logic

Stephen R. L. Clark

23 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Classical Philosophy and Thought Philosophy and Theoretical Science Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Abstract

Abstract I consider reasons for questioning ‘the laws of logic’ (identity, non-contradiction, excluded middle, and negation), and suggest that these laws do not accord with everyday reality. Either they are rhetorical tools rather than absolute truths, or else Plato and his successors were right to think that they identify a reality distinct from the ordinary world of experience, and also from the ultimate source of reality.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

References

1891The Principles of Psychology 1982Orality and Literacy 2003Purity and Danger 1986On the Plurality of Worlds 1967Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo.1976Cognitive development : its cultural and social foundations 1987The Hellenistic Philosophers 1967African Traditional Thought and Western Science

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.