Reforming research assessment

Randy W. Schekman · Mark N. Patterson

39 citations0/0 files storedeLife

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Publishing and Open Access Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

It is time for the research community to rethink how the outputs of scientific research are evaluated and, as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment makes clear, this should involve replacing the journal impact factor with a broad range of more meaningful approaches.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

1992The skewness of science 2009Citation Statistics 2010Metrics: Do metrics matter?2008Escape from the impact factor

Cited by

2014Pathological publishing: A new psychological disorder with legal consequences?2022Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis 2017Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science 2022Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions 2015A Falsification of the Citation Impediment in the Taxonomic Literature 2021Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments 2017Is medical research informing professional practice more highly cited? Evidence from AHFS DI Essentials in drugs.com 2016Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.