SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer
12 references·9 citing·48 second hop
Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer (2012)Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine (2010)Quality of reporting of trial…The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2008)The quality of reporting of t…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Transition From Meeting Abstract to Full-length Journal Article for Randomized Controlled Trials (2006)Transition From Meeting Abstr…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved (2006)Reporting of trials presented…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Accuracy of Abstracts for Original Research Articles in Pharmacy Journals (2004)Accuracy of Abstracts for Ori…Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials (2001)Incomplete evidence: the inad…Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts…Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts (1993)Presentation Deficiencies in …Misleading Reporting (Spin) in Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology With Statistically Not Significant Results (2021)Misleading Reporting (Spin) i…Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review (2021)Do not make clinical decision…Evaluation of spin in oncology clinical trials (2019)Evaluation of spin in oncolog…Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals (2019)Assessing the Quality of Abst…The degree of adherence to CONSORT reporting guidelines for the abstracts of randomised clinical trials published in anaesthesia journals (2018)The degree of adherence to CO…Spin in articles about minimally invasive transanal total mesorectal excision: an assessment of the current literature (2018)Spin in articles about minima…Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research (2018)Reporting guidelines for onco…The over-representation of significant p values in abstracts compared to corresponding full texts: A systematic review of surgical randomized trials (2017)The over-representation of si…Quality and clarity in systematic review abstracts: an empirical study (2016)Quality and clarity in system…Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved (1999)Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Balancing benefits and harms in health care (2003)Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials of Mental Health Interventions (2004)Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Review: Benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder: heterogeneity of outcomes based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials (2007)Press Releases by Academic Medical Centers: Not So Academic? (2009)Are Medical Conferences Useful? And for Whom? (2012)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured Abstracts (1998)A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing (2007)Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals (2010)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research (2017)Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration (2021)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2010)Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews (2013)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 1999Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles300 cited
  • 2006Transition From Meeting Abstract to Full-length Journal Article for Randomized Controlled Trials159 cited
  • 2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals133 cited
  • 2001Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials110 cited
  • 2006Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved98 cited
  • 1993Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts97 cited
  • 2010Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine49 cited
  • 2004Accuracy of Abstracts for Original Research Articles in Pharmacy Journals44 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Misleading Reporting (Spin) in Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology With Statistically Not Significant Results

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

36 cited
  • 2018Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research29 cited
  • 2019Evaluation of spin in oncology clinical trials29 cited
  • 2018The degree of adherence to CONSORT reporting guidelines for the abstracts of randomised clinical trials published in anaesthesia journals25 cited
  • 2021Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review24 cited
  • 2016Quality and clarity in systematic review abstracts: an empirical study23 cited
  • 2019Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals21 cited
  • 2017The over-representation of significant p values in abstracts compared to corresponding full texts: A systematic review of surgical randomized trials20 cited
  • 2018Spin in articles about minimally invasive transanal total mesorectal excision: an assessment of the current literature11 cited