The Relationship of IQ to Effort Test Performance

Andy C. Dean · Tara L. Victor · Kyle Brauer Boone · Ginger Arnold

106 citations0/0 files storedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Deception detection and forensic psychology Historical and Modern Theater Studies

Abstract

The relationship between IQ and nine effort indicators was examined in a sample of 189 neuropsychology clinic outpatients who were not in litigation or attempting to obtain disability. Participants with the lowest IQ (50-59) failed approximately 60% of the effort tests, while patients with an IQ of 60 to 69 failed 44% of effort indicators, and individuals with borderline IQ (70 to 79) exhibited a 17% failure rate. All patients with IQ < 70 failed at least one effort test. Cutoffs for the Warrington Recognition Memory Test (Words) and Finger Tapping maintained the highest specificities in low IQ samples.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 106 citations exist upstream.

References

2002The Rey 15-Item Recognition Trial: A Technique to Enhance Sensitivity of the Rey 15-Item Memorization Test 2003Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test and the Meyers and Meyers Recognition Trial in the Detection of Suspect Effort 2006Detecting Incomplete Effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition 2003Word Memory Test Performance in Children

Cited by

2008Interpreting the Meaning of Multiple Symptom Validity Test Failure 2018Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes 2009The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words as a Measure of Response Bias: Total Score and Response Time Cutoffs Developed on "Real World" Credible and Noncredible Subjects 2014Examination of Performance Validity Test Failure in Relation to Number of Tests Administered 2010Offenders With Intellectual Disability: Characteristics, Prevalence, and Issues in Forensic Assessment 2018Wait, There’s a Baby in this Bath Water! Update on Quantitative and Qualitative Cut-Offs for Rey 15-Item Recall and Recognition 2009Examination Of Various Wms-Iii Logical Memory Scores In The Assessment Of Response Bias 2012

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.