SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparing estimates of cost effectiveness submitted to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) by different organisations: retrospective study
7 references·2 citing·32 second hop
Comparing estimates of cost effectiveness submitted to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) by different organisations: retrospective study (2004)Comparing estimates of cost effectiveness…Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Methods for the Economic Eval…Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis (2004)Does NICE have a cost‐effecti…Probabilistic Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Models: Choosing between Treatment Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (2002)Probabilistic Analysis of Cos…NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies (2001)NICE: faster access to modern…Handling Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Models (2000)Handling Uncertainty in Cost-…The effectiveness of cost-effectiveness analysis in containing costs (1998)The effectiveness of cost-eff…Costs, effects and C/E‐ratios alongside a clinical trial (1994)Costs, effects and C/E‐ratios…A systematic review of coverage decision-making on health technologies—Evidence from the real world (2012)A systematic review of covera…NICE and the challenge of cancer drugs (2009)NICE and the challenge of can…A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations (2007)The NICE Cost-Effectiveness Threshold (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies (1999)Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold (2008)Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions (2008)International survey on willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness? (2009)A Guide to Simulation (1983)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves – facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions (2004)Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials II—An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report (2015)Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical Practices (1977)Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Cost-effectiveness of a primary care depression intervention (2003)Review of Eight Pharmacoeconomic Studies of the Value of Biologic DMARDs Adalimumab, Etanercept, and Infliximab) in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis (2006)Saying No Isn't NICE — The Travails of Britain's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008)Cancer economics, policy and politics: What informs the debate? Perspectives from the EU, Canada and US (2014)Evaluation of the personal health budget pilot programme (2017)Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal (1986)Markov Models in Medical Decision Making (1993)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment (2004)Good Practice Guidelines for Decision-Analytic Modelling in Health Technology Assessment (2006)Net Health Benefits (1998)A National Catalog of Preference-Based Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States (2005)Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): The silence of the lambda (2005)Optimal Cost-Effectiveness Decisions: The Role of the Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve (CEAC), the Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Frontier (CEAF), and the Expected Value of Perfection Information (EVPI) (2008)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2016)A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme (2004)Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach (2004)The cost-effectiveness of screening for oral cancer in primary care (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes13,647 cited
  • 1994Costs, effects and C/E‐ratios alongside a clinical trial963 cited
  • 2000Handling Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Models806 cited
  • 2004Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis710 cited
  • 2002Probabilistic Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Models: Choosing between Treatment Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease413 cited
  • 2001NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies299 cited
  • 1998The effectiveness of cost-effectiveness analysis in containing costs120 cited

Cited by

  • 2009NICE and the challenge of cancer drugs73 cited
  • 2012A systematic review of coverage decision-making on health technologies—Evidence from the real world56 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work