SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis
16 references·7 citing·31 second hop
A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis (2006)A Practical Guide to Meta-AnalysisSystematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000)Empirical assessment of effec…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Operating Characteristics of …Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Review papers : The statistic…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Statistical Methods for Meta-…Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis (1987)Meta-Analysis: Quantitative M…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-…Psychometric Properties of the Critical Appraisal Tool for Anatomical Meta‐Analysis (2025)Psychometric Properties of th…The Critical Appraisal Tool for Anatomical Meta‐analysis: A framework for critically appraising anatomical meta‐analyses (2022)The Critical Appraisal Tool f…Seeing the forest for the trees: How to interpret a meta‐analysis forest plot (2020)Seeing the forest for the tre…Organizing a Multidisciplinary Research Team: Strategies, Execution, and Outcomes (2019)Organizing a Multidisciplinar…Meta-Analyses in Plastic Surgery: Can We Trust Their Results? (2019)Meta-Analyses in Plastic Surg…Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (2011)Systematic Reviews and Meta‐A…The Role of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Research and Practice (2008)The Role of Systematic Review…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders (2011)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1994Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias16,951 cited
  • 1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis10,330 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1986Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.4,785 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,413 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2000Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses1,398 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis1,371 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,306 cited
  • 1993Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis1,284 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022The Critical Appraisal Tool for Anatomical Meta‐analysis: A framework for critically appraising anatomical meta‐analyses43 cited
    • 2008The Role of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Research and Practice27 cited
    • 2019Meta-Analyses in Plastic Surgery: Can We Trust Their Results?21 cited
    • 2020Seeing the forest for the trees: How to interpret a meta‐analysis forest plot14 cited
    • 2011Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis10 cited
    • 2019Organizing a Multidisciplinary Research Team: Strategies, Execution, and Outcomes9 cited
    • 2025Psychometric Properties of the Critical Appraisal Tool for Anatomical Meta‐Analysis7 cited