Reporting practice, impression management and company performance: a longitudinal and comparative analysis of water leakage disclosure

Stuart Cooper · Richard Slack

92 citations0/0 files storedAccounting and Business Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Financial Reporting and XBRL

Abstract

This paper aims to determine whether corporate reporting practice, consistent with impression management, changes depending upon company performance. A longitudinal analysis, rarely used in prior impression management research, enables changes in annual report disclosures, both narrative and visual, to be identified and considered relative to a company's performance. Our analysis is based upon the disclosure of leakage performance, a strategic and stakeholder issue in the water industry, by all 10 water and sewerage companies (WASCs) in England and Wales over the 7-year period 2005–2006 to 2011–2012. Our longitudinal data are also compared across companies and contrasted with the expert counter account provided by the industry regulator, OFWAT. We find that the level, nature and presentation of a WASC's leakage disclosures change markedly reflective of their performance against OFWAT's target. Our evidence shows that the changes in reporting practice include the use of tactics and presentational methods consistent with impression management, raising concerns regarding the balance and trustworthiness of voluntary disclosures in the annual report. We suggest that the International Accounting Standards Board should further consider their guidance on narrative disclosures, including presentational format, to reduce the scope for impression management within corporate reporting.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports 1989Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory 1988Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality 2004A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes 1966Financial Accounting Theory.2004The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap 1995Accounts, excuses, and apologies: a theory of image restoration strategies 2013Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports

Cited by

2016The Frontstage and Backstage of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Bill 2022A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda 2022The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation 2020Sustainability reporting after the Costa Concordia disaster: a multi-theory study on legitimacy, impression management and image restoration

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.