Articlegreen2009

Validation of the Italian version of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation outcome measure (CORE‐OM)

143 citations0/0 files storedClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation--Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) was translated into Italian and tested in non-clinical (n = 263) and clinical (n = 647) samples. The translation showed good acceptability, internal consistency and convergent validity in both samples. There were large and statistically significant differences between clinical and non-clinical datasets on all scores. The reliable change criteria were similar to those for the UK referential data. Some of the clinically significant change criteria, particularly for the men, were moderately different from the UK cutting points. The Italian version of the CORE-OM showed respectable psychometric parameters. However, it seemed plausible that non-clinical and clinical distributions of self-report scores on psychopathology and functioning measures may differ by language and culture. KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: *A good quality Italian translation of the CORE-OM, and hence the GP-CORE, CORE-10 and CORE-5 measures also, is now available for use by practitioners and anyone surveying or exploring general psychological state. The measures can be obtained from CORE-IMS or yourself and practitioners are encouraged to share anonymised data so that good clinical and non-clinical referential databases can be established for Italy.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 143 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale 1951Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests 1966The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors 1991Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.1977Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the scl-90: A study in construct validation 1996The Reliability and Validity of the Outcome Questionnaire 2002Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM 1993A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change.

Cited by

2014Development and validation of a 6-item working alliance questionnaire for repeated administrations during psychotherapy.2013Working alliance predicts psychotherapy outcome even while controlling for prior symptom improvement 2012The British Sign Language Versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale 2012Validation of the Swedish Version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM)

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.