SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial Data
2 references·16 citing·51 second hop
Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial Data (2014)Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial D…Improving Validation Practices in “Omics” Research (2011)Improving Validation Practice…Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science (1997)Withholding Research Results …Epidemiological characteristics and prevalence rates of research reproducibility across disciplines: A scoping review of articles published in 2018-2019 (2023)Epidemiological characteristi…Misinformation in and about science (2021)Misinformation in and about s…Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods (2020)Future of evidence ecosystem …Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies (2019)Increase value and reduce was…DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies (2019)DEBATE-statistical analysis p…Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating (2018)Verify original results throu…The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis (2018)The role of meta-analyses and…Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting (2018)Caveat emptor: the combined e…Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results (2017)Many analysts, one dataset: M…Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials (2017)Fragility of Results in Ophth…Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda (2017)Evidence appraisal: a scoping…Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials (2017)Evaluation of Evidence of Sta…Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications (2016)Randomized trials are frequen…From Qualitative Reviews to Umbrella Reviews (2016)From Qualitative Reviews to U…Social Work Research: 2044 (2015)Social Work Research: 2044Journal editors impasse with outcome reporting bias (2015)Journal editors impasse with …Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors among Life Scientists (1989)Relationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences — An Industry Survey (1996)Publication and related biases. (2000)When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions (2008)The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions (2010)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014)When Quality Beats Quantity: Decision Theory, Drug Discovery, and the Reproducibility Crisis (2016)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Outcomes in randomised controlled trials in prevention and management of carious lesions: a systematic review (2017)Analysis of articles directly related to randomized trials finds poor protocol availability and inconsistent linking of articles (2020)Biases in reporting of adverse effects in clinical trials, and potential impact on safety assessments in systematic reviews and therapy guidelines (2022)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)What is a meta-epidemiological study? Analysis of published literature indicated heterogeneous study designs and definitions (2020)How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions (2022)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)The Fragility Index of Hip Arthroscopy Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Survey (2021)The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Review (2021)Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package (2022)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: umbrella review of randomised evidence (2020)Validity of observational evidence on putative risk and protective factors: appraisal of 3744 meta-analyses on 57 topics (2021)COVID-19 and common mental health symptoms in the early phase of the pandemic: An umbrella review of the evidence (2023)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. (1998)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Bridging research integrity and global health epidemiology (BRIDGE) guidelines: explanation and elaboration (2020)Assessing the association between Corporate Financial Influence and implementation of policies to tackle commercial determinants of non-communicable diseases: A cross-sectional analysis of 172 countries (2022)ESMO Guidance for Reporting Oncology real-World evidence (GROW) (2023)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews1 (2023)Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review (2023)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Synthesizing evidence in sustainability science through harmonized experiments: Community monitoring in common pool resources (2021)Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human Solutions (2023)Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science605 cited
  • 2011Improving Validation Practices in “Omics” Research246 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Misinformation in and about science391 cited
  • 2017Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials148 cited
  • 2017Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results74 cited
  • 2017Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials53 cited
  • 2019DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies47 cited
  • 2018The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis44 cited
  • 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods36 cited
  • 2016Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications32 cited
  • 2018Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating31 cited
  • 2017Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda30 cited
  • 2015Social Work Research: 204429 cited
  • 2023Epidemiological characteristics and prevalence rates of research reproducibility across disciplines: A scoping review of articles published in 2018-2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

25 cited
  • 2019Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies22 cited
  • 2015Journal editors impasse with outcome reporting bias21 cited
  • 2016From Qualitative Reviews to Umbrella Reviews21 cited
  • 2018Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting21 cited