SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
16 references·2 citing·42 second hop
Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: Common pitfalls and how to avoid them (2014)Randomized controlled trials in dentistry…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting (2014)Active implementation strateg…Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011 (2012)Reporting quality of abstract…Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals? (2012)Are clustering effects accoun…Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011)Cochrane handbook for systema…Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research (2010)Science mapping analysis char…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals (2010)An assessment of quality char…Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Including Non‐Randomized Studies (2008)Including Non‐Randomized Stud…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…How do we create, and improve, the evidence base? (2016)How do we create, and improve…Reporting quality of randomised controlled trials published in prosthodontic and implantology journals (2015)Reporting quality of randomis…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Interventions for Pediatric Insomnia (2014)Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review (2018)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2011Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration810 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
  • 2008Including Non‐Randomized Studies308 cited
  • 2010Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research97 cited
  • 2010An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals94 cited
  • 2014Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

92 cited
  • 2012Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 201171 cited
  • 2012Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals?65 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015Reporting quality of randomised controlled trials published in prosthodontic and implantology journals39 cited
    • 2016How do we create, and improve, the evidence base?21 cited