Articlediamond2013

Using the Monte Carlo Simulation Methods in Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility of Measurement System Analysis

39 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Research and Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring Management and Optimization Techniques Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Abstract

Measurements are required to maintain the consistent quality of all finished and semi-finished products in a productionline. Many firms in the automobile and general precision industries apply the TS 16949:2009 Technical Specificationsand Measurement System Analysis (MSA) manual to establish measurement systems. This work is undertaken toevaluate gauge repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) to verify the measuring ability and quality of the measurementframe, as well as to continuously improve and maintain the verification process. Nevertheless, the implementation ofGR&R requires considerable time and manpower, and is likely to affect production adversely. In addition, the evaluationvalue for GR&R is always different owing to the sum of man-made and machine-made variations. Using a Monte Carlosimulation and the prediction of the repeatability and reproducibility of the measurement system analysis, this study aimsto determine the distribution of %GR&R and the related number of distinct categories (ndc). This study uses two casestudies of an automobile parts manufacturer and the combination of a Monte Carlo simulation, statistical bases, and theprediction of the repeatability and reproducibility of the measurement system analysis to determine the probability densityfunction, the distribution of %GR&R, and the related number of distinct categories (ndc). The method used in this studycould evaluate effectively the possible range of the GR&R of the measurement capability, in order to establish aprediction model for the evaluation of the measurement capacity of a measurement system.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

2004Quality Systems—Medical Devices—Particular Requirements for the Application of ISO 9001 2010Simulation modeling for analysis 2003A Review of Methods for Measurement Systems Capability Analysis 1993GAUGE CAPABILITY AND DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS. PART I: BASIC METHODS 1993GAUGE CAPABILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS. PART II: EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MODELS AND VARIANCE COMPONENT ESTIMATION 1972Repeatability and Reproducibility 1991Evaluating the Measurement Process 2010Evaluating measurement and process capabilities by GR&R with four quality measures

Cited by

2015Combining Scott-Knott and GR&R methods to identify special causes of variation 2019A new multivariate approach based on weighted factor scores and confidence ellipses to precision evaluation of textured fiber bobbins measurement system 2019New indicators for measurement error detection in GR&R studies 2015Analysis on Accuracy of Bias, Linearity and Stability of Measurement System in Ball screw Processes by Simulation 2020Repeatability of High-Pressure Measurement in a Diesel Engine Test Bed

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.