Ensuring value for money in health care: the role of health technology assessment in the European Union

Corinna Sorenson · Michael Drummond · Panos G. Kanavos

120 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy Global Health Care Issues

Abstract

This book provides a detailed review of the role of health technology assessment (HTA) in the European Union. It examines both method and process in the prioritization and financing of modern health care, and presents extensive case studies from Sweden, the Netherlands, Finland, France, Germany and the United Kingdom.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 120 citations exist upstream.

References

1992Medical Care Costs: How Much Welfare Loss?2001Is Technological Change In Medicine Worth It?2004National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments 2004Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis 2006Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review 2001Health Economic Guidelines—Similarities, Differences and Some Implications 2002BEST PRACTICE IN UNDERTAKING AND REPORTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS 2002Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidence

Cited by

2019Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art 2010Medical technology procurement in Europe: A cross-country comparison of current practice and policy 2021Similarities and Differences in Health Technology Assessment Systems and Implications for Coverage Decisions: Evidence from 32 Countries 2012Commonalities and differences in HTA outcomes: A comparative analysis of five countries and implications for coverage decisions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.