A new framework for strategic planning to stabilize a shrinking lake

Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib · Ali Azarnivand · Richard C. Peralta

30 citations0/0 files storedLake and Reservoir Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Strategic Planning and Analysis Multi-Criteria Decision Making Water resources management and optimization

Abstract

Preventing Lake Urmia, the sixth largest saltwater (endorheic) lake on the earth, from rapidly drying up is a paramount mission of the Iranian government. Thus, a new framework was proposed to develop a strategic plan to stabilize the shrinking lake, based on sustainable development criteria (SDC). We developed the strategies via the new hybrid Strategic Sustainable Planning Framework (SSPF), including a strength–weakness–opportunity–threat (SWOT) analysis matrix, SDC, multi-criteria decision making models (MCDMs), and sensitivity analysis. First, to develop aggressive, conservative, competitive, and defensive strategies, SSPF analyzed site-specific internal strengths and weaknesses plus external opportunities and threats. It then, preliminarily ranked the strategies by embedding SDC within MCDMs (Analytic Hierarchy Process [AHP]; Simple Additive Weighting [SAW]; and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution [TOPSIS]). To promote confidence in selection of the strategy, sensitivity analyses of the results were also performed. Here, the selected strategy had the highest rank among the set of strategies, with the least sensitivity to the input data variations. SAW and AHP were the models least and most sensitive to SDC weight variations, respectively. According to sustainability analysis, the purely structurally oriented strategies were determined to be environmentally non-sustainable. Based on the results, we identified 2 conservative–competitive strategies that could stabilize the lake and prevent future losses. Adding MCDMs to the combination of SWOT and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (SWOT-QSPM) enhanced the process of decision making. Hence, we recommend SSPF as a helpful approach in evaluating sustainable and strategic solutions to this and similar problems.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process 1981Multiple Attribute Decision Making 1981Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications 1980The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation 2003The Delphi technique: myths and realities 1979Multiple Objective Decision Making ― Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey 2008Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead 1990Strategic management: Concepts and cases

Cited by

2018A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model for the sustainable management of aquifers

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.