SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What does ‘clinically important’ really mean? · Study

WorkWhat does ‘clinically important’ really mean?

Manuela Loureiro Ferreira2008

OA

Workbronze2008

What does ‘clinically important’ really mean?

Manuela Loureiro Ferreira · Rob Herbert

48 citations·0/0 files stored·Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life 2006Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach 2000How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes 2000How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. II: Dichotomous outcomes

Cited by

2020Inclusion of Effect Size Measures and Clinical Relevance in Research Papers

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability studyarticle · 2 shared references 2015Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysisarticle · 2 shared references 2013Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc diseasearticle · 2 shared references 2009Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied “minimally important change” valuesarticle · 2 shared references 2019Statistics for Evaluating Pre-post Change: Relation Between Change in the Distribution Center and Change in the Individual Scoresarticle · 2 shared references 2020Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: A systematic surveyarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year2008

Typeeditorial

Published2008-01-01

VenueAustralian Journal of Physiotherapy

ISSN-L0004-9514

Languageen

Citations48

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/s0004-9514(08)70001-1

openalex_workW2115149247

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.