Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Misleading abstract conclusions in randomized controlled trials in rheumatology: Comparison of the abstract conclusions and the results section

16 references·11 citing·38 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
1982

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials

509 cited

2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited

2002Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making395 cited

Cited by

2023Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses33 cited
2020A randomized trial of an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract’s conclusion of manuscripts showed no significant effect27 cited
2021Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review24 cited
2022Reporting characteristics of journal infographics: a cross-sectional study24 cited
2012Reporting clinical research: Guidance to encourage accurate and transparent research reporting19 cited
2021Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses18 cited
2018Benefits and Threats to Using Social Media for Presenting and Implementing Evidence18 cited
2017Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A meta-epidemiological investigation15 cited
2024Narrative bias (“spin”) is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain14 cited
2017Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial14 cited
2019Expert quotes and exaggeration in health news: a retrospective quantitative content analysis11 cited