Articlegreen2011

What Happened to the ‘Development’ in Sustainable Development? Business Guidelines Two Decades After Brundtland

Ralf Barkemeyer · Diane Holt · Lutz Preuss · Stephen Tsang

237 citations0/0 files storedSustainable Development

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Sustainable Development and Environmental Management Sustainability and Innovation in Business

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over 20 years ago Our Common Future presented a conceptualization and explanation of the concept of sustainable development. Since then, numerous alternative definitions of the concept have been offered, of which at least some are exclusive to each other. At the same time, the role of business in the transition to sustainable development has increasingly received attention. Bringing these two trends in sustainable development together, this paper returns to the Brundtland version of the concept to examine to what extent the original principles of sustainable development are still embedded within key business guidelines, namely the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ICC Business Charter for Sustainable Development, the CAUX Principles, the Global Sullivan Principles and the CERES Principles. The findings suggest that these business guidelines tend to emphasize environmental rather than social aspects of sustainable development, in particular to the detriment of the original Brundtland prioritization of the needs of the poorest. Furthermore, the attention to environmental aspects stresses win–win situations and has a clear managerialist focus; whereas more conceptual environmental issues concerning systems interdependencies, critical thresholds or systemic limits to growth find little attention. The normative codes and principles targeted at the private sector therefore not only add another voice to the multiple discourses on sustainable development but also contribute to a reinterpretation of the original agenda set by Brundtland towards conceptualizations of sustainable development around the needs of industrialized rather than developing countries. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 237 citations exist upstream.

References

1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales 1998How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?1994Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development 1999Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela 2018The Millennium Development Goals Report 1995Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research 1955Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding 2000Global Business Regulation

Cited by

2016Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs 2020Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings and Ratings 2017Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review 2014The financial sector's impact on sustainable development 2012Corporate Social Responsibility of the Financial Sector – Strengths, Weaknesses and the Impact on Sustainable Development

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.