Citation map · Study

Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?

14 references·10 citing·38 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
2008CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts460 cited
2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited
2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals89 cited
2006Structured abstracts: Do they improve the quality of information in abstracts?86 cited
2012Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 201171 cited
2008Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals66 cited
2010Assessment of the Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Five Leading Chinese Medical Journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by