SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
African HIV/AIDS Trials Are More Likely to Report Adequate Allocation Concealment and Random Generation than North American Trials
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
African HIV/AIDS Trials Are More Likely to Report Adequate Allocation Concealment and Random Generation than North American Trials (2008)African HIV/AIDS Trials Are More Likely t…Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery (2006)Standards of Reporting of Ran…Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)Bad reporting does not mean b…Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis (2003)Methodological Differences in…Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records (2002)Identification of randomized …Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (2001)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …North and South: bridging the information gap (2000)North and South: bridging the…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasThe New Encyclopaedia Britannica (1991)The New Encyclopaedia Britann…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC (1987)The impact of child sexual abuse on health: A systematic review of reviews (2009)The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies. (2018)Access to specialty healthcare in urban versus rural US populations: a systematic literature review (2019)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain (2016)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition (1992)Federal Republic of Nigeria (2009)The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research (2020)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 1991The New Encyclopaedia Britannica1,583 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2002Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records340 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 2004Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group313 cited
  • 2001Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials238 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2000North and South: bridging the information gap198 cited
  • 2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
  • 2003Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis154 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.