SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Averages of ratios vs. ratios of averages: An empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation
15 references·15 citing·40 second hop
Averages of ratios vs. ratios of averages: An empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation (2011)Averages of ratios vs. ratios of averages…Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis (2011)Towards a new crown indicator…Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations (2010)Which scientific elites? On t…Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010)Towards a new crown indicator…There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization (2010)There are neither “king” nor …Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010)Rivals for the crown: Reply t…Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS (2010)Remaining problems with the “…Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations (2010)Normalization at the field le…Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Measuring contextual citation…CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre (2010)CWTS crown indicator measures…Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance (2010)Caveats for the journal and f…The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns (2008)The Effects of Aging on Resea…Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor (2008)Modifying the journal impact …Lifting the crown—citation z-score (2007)Lifting the crown—citation z-…Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Citation Analysis in Research…Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)Relative indicators and relat…A field- and time-normalized Bayesian approach to measuring the impact of a publication (2024)A field- and time-normalized …Globalised vs averaged: Bias and ranking performance on the author level (2019)Globalised vs averaged: Bias …Information and misinformation in bibliometric time-trend analysis (2018)Information and misinformatio…Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach (2016)Ranking authors using fractio…Proposal of using scaling for calculating field-normalized citation scores (2016)Proposal of using scaling for…Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Supplementary Report I to the…A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2015)A review of the literature on…Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor (2013)Multidimensional Journal Eval…Group size, h-index, and efficiency in publishing in top journals explain expert panel assessments of research group quality and productivity (2013)Group size, h-index, and effi…Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: High- and low-impact citation indicators (2012)Sub-field normalization in th…Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators (2012)Sub-field normalization in th…Reflections on the activity index and related indicators (2012)Reflections on the activity i…Averages of ratios compared to ratios of averages: Mathematical results (2012)Averages of ratios compared t…International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: a perspective from paper and patent analysis (2011)International scientific and …A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicatorsA farewell to the MNCS and li…Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge (2011)Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors (2011)Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories (2015)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators (2003)Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods (2016)The skewness of science (1992)New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists (2011)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications (2011)Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)Meta-assessment of bias in science (2017)Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics (1976)Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations (2010)A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators (2013)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications (2011)Advances in bibliometric analysis: research performance assessment and science mapping (2014)Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics (2019)Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation (2017)Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,390 cited
  • 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals624 cited
  • 1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact448 cited
  • 2010Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations425 cited
  • 2007Lifting the crown—citation z-score274 cited
  • 2011Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis229 cited
  • 2008The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns225 cited
  • 2010Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance190 cited
  • 2008Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor180 cited
  • 2010Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff104 cited
  • 2010Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations103 cited
  • 2010Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations92 cited
  • 2010CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre61 cited
  • 2010There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization58 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS53 cited
  • Cited by

    • n.d.A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators48 cited
    • 2011International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: a perspective from paper and patent analysis45 cited
    • 2016Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach41 cited
    • 2012Reflections on the activity index and related indicators34 cited
    • 2012Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators25 cited
    • 2013Group size, h-index, and efficiency in publishing in top journals explain expert panel assessments of research group quality and productivity22 cited
    • 2018Information and misinformation in bibliometric time-trend analysis20 cited
    • 2012Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: High- and low-impact citation indicators16 cited
    • 2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management16 cited
    • 2016Proposal of using scaling for calculating field-normalized citation scores12 cited
    • 2013Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor11 cited
    • 2012Averages of ratios compared to ratios of averages: Mathematical results11 cited
    • 2024A field- and time-normalized Bayesian approach to measuring the impact of a publication10 cited
    • 2015A review of the literature on citation impact indicators10 cited
    • 2019Globalised vs averaged: Bias and ranking performance on the author level9 cited