SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review
16 references·4 citing·37 second hop
A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review (2013)A qualitative study into the difficulties…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)Cochrane Database of Systemat…Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Cochrane Database of Systemat…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey (2006)Sample sizes of studies on di…Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool …Cognitive Interviewing (2005)Cognitive InterviewingCognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design (2004)Cognitive Interviewing: A Too…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…How to Study Thinking in Everyday Life: Contrasting Think-Aloud Protocols With Descriptions and Explanations of Thinking (1998)How to Study Thinking in Ever…Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading (1997)Verbal Protocols of Reading: …Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading (1996)Verbal Protocols of Reading: …The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The cochrane database of syst…Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Use of methodological standar…Guidance was developed on how to write a plain language summary for diagnostic test accuracy reviews (2018)Guidance was developed on how…Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial (2016)Do Cochrane summaries help st…Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study (2014)Incorporating quality assessm…How much do you need: a randomised experiment of whether readers can understand the key messages from summaries of Cochrane Reviews without reading the full review (2014)How much do you need: a rando…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Research Synthesis: The Practice of Cognitive Interviewing (2007)Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience (2009)Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87 (2014)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses (2012)Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders (2014)Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses (2019)Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications (1999)The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning (2000)Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension (2009)A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions (2008)Social determinants of mental health (2014)Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding (2011)Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 1996The cochrane database of systematic reviews5,989 cited
  • 2011Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4,664 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4,527 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2004Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design1,934 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2005Cognitive Interviewing1,759 cited
  • 1996Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading1,009 cited
  • 1997Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading913 cited
  • 2006Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies769 cited
  • 2023Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy755 cited
  • 1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
  • 1998How to Study Thinking in Everyday Life: Contrasting Think-Aloud Protocols With Descriptions and Explanations of Thinking

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

658 cited
  • 2006Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey184 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2014How much do you need: a randomised experiment of whether readers can understand the key messages from summaries of Cochrane Reviews without reading the full review24 cited
    • 2014Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study18 cited
    • 2018Guidance was developed on how to write a plain language summary for diagnostic test accuracy reviews15 cited
    • 2016Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial10 cited