Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the JournalJack E. Fincham2008-09-01articleAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education1,302 citationsbronzeNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Survey Methodology and NonresponseHigher Education Research StudiesPharmacy and Medical PracticesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,302 citations exist upstream.References1989Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method2000A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys2004A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates1990Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method2006E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review2008Best Practices for Survey Research Reports: A Synopsis for Authors and ReviewersCited by2018Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance2017Relationships between the neighborhood environment and depression in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis2020The threat of COVID‐19 and its influence on nursing staff burnout2018Service quality evaluation and the mediating role of perceived value and customer satisfaction in customer loyalty2021Understanding the Healthy Immigrant Effect in the Context of Mental Health Challenges: A Systematic Critical Review2020Internal green integration and environmental performance: The predictive power of proactive environmental strategy, greening the supplier, and environmental collaboration with the supplier2018Understanding Older People’s Readiness for Receiving Telehealth: Mixed-Method Study2017The nutrition for sport knowledge questionnaire (NSKQ): development and validation using classical test theory and Rasch analysis