SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct Among a Group of Researchers in N igeria
5 references·16 citing·44 second hop
Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct Among a Group of Researchers in N igeria (2012)Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct Among…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research (2006)Normal Misbehavior: Scientist…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyThe politics of publication (2003)The politics of publicationThe Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation (1984)The Complete Works of Aristot…The Ethical Compass: Establishing ethical guidelines for research practices in sports medicine and exercise science (2024)The Ethical Compass: Establis…Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science (2021)Rethinking success, integrity…Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain (2021)Research Misconduct in the Fi…Reimagining authorship guidelines to promote equity in co-produced academic collaborations (2021)Reimagining authorship guidel…Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China (2020)Perceptions of plagiarism by …Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing (2020)Documenting contributions to …Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams (2019)Researchers’ Perceptions of E…Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science (2019)Misconduct and Misbehavior Re…Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration (2018)Resolving authorship disputes…Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China (2018)Integrity in Biomedical Resea…An empirical analysis of differences in plagiarism among world cultures (2018)An empirical analysis of diff…Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications (2017)Best Practice to Order Author…Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers (2017)Authorship, plagiarism and co…A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East (2017)A Cross-Sectional Survey Stud…Academic dishonesty in higher education: students’ perceptions and involvement in an African institution (2016)Academic dishonesty in higher…Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country (2014)Misconduct in research: a des…Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)Morals, morale and motivations in data fabrication: Medical research fieldworkers views and practices in two Sub-Saharan African contexts (2016)Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct (2016)The division of labor in society (1935)Social Structure and Anomie (1938)The Rules of Sociological Method (1982)Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists (2007)Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field (2010)Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning (1993)The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (2005)Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research (2013)Authorship trends in The Lancet Global Health: only the tip of the iceberg? (2018)El plagio y las revistas depredadoras como amenaza a la integridad científica (2018)A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine (2020)Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research (2001)Plagiarism in Latin Literature (2012)Plagiarism in second-language writing (2014)Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism Policy in Higher Education: a Comparison of the United Kingdom, Czechia, Poland and Romania (2018)An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education (2020)Managing the mutations: academic misconduct in Australia, New Zealand and the UK (2020)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Survey of equal contributions in biomedical research publications (2020)Task specialization across research careers (2020)Scientific collaboration (2007)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies (2021)Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research (2021)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Human Development in Poor Countries: On the Role of Private Incomes and Public Services (1993)On What Grounds What (2009)Biodemography of human ageing (2010)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1984The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation2,382 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 2003The politics of publication359 cited
  • 2006Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research254 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers93 cited
  • 2019Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science82 cited
  • 2020Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing78 cited
  • 2014Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country77 cited
  • 2018An empirical analysis of differences in plagiarism among world cultures71 cited
  • 2019Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams65 cited
  • 2017A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East56 cited
  • 2017Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications55 cited
  • 2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Academic dishonesty in higher education: students’ perceptions and involvement in an African institution
54 cited
  • 2024The Ethical Compass: Establishing ethical guidelines for research practices in sports medicine and exercise science48 cited
  • 2021Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science47 cited
  • 2021Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain42 cited
  • 2020Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China41 cited
  • 2018Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration40 cited
  • 2021Reimagining authorship guidelines to promote equity in co-produced academic collaborations39 cited
  • 2018Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China38 cited