Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The reporting of randomized controlled trials in prosthodontics.

7 references·16 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
1987Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysis216 cited
2002Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of oral implants.93 cited

Cited by

2014Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?53 cited
2016A quality assessment of randomized controlled trial reports in endodontics41 cited
2015Reporting quality of randomised controlled trials published in prosthodontic and implantology journals39 cited
2012What’s in a title? An assessment of whether randomized controlled trial in a title means that it is one36 cited
2011Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry35 cited
2011Reporting of Research Quality Characteristics of Studies Published in 6 Major Clinical Dental Specialty Journals33 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002

Nearly half of dental randomized controlled trials published in German are not included in Medline

33 cited

2017Impact of the CONSORT Statement endorsement in the completeness of reporting of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry30 cited

2016Research Reporting Guidelines in Dentistry: A Survey of Editors25 cited

2014An assessment of the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials published in paediatric dentistry journals23 cited

2013Focusing on outcomes and methods in removable prosthodontics trials: a systematic review20 cited

2005Changes in the prosthodontic literature 1966 to 2042.20 cited

2012Mislabeling Controlled Clinical Trials (CCTs) as “Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs)” in Dental Specialty Journals18 cited

2004The reporting quality of abstracts of randomised controlled trials submitted to the ICS meeting in Heidelberg18 cited

2013Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic‐related systematic reviews17 cited

2018Quality improvement in randomized controlled trial abstracts in prosthodontics since the publication of CONSORT guideline for abstracts: A systematic review16 cited