SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bibliographic Databases: Some Critical Points
9 references·3 citing·39 second hop
Bibliographic Databases: Some Critical Points (2013)Bibliographic Databases: Some Critical Po…Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors at the Forefront of Improving the Quality and Indexing Chances of its Member Journals (2013)Korean Association of Medical…Social Networks in Medical Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2012)Social Networks in Medical Ed…Indexed journal: What does it mean? (2012)Indexed journal: What does it…Biomedical research platforms and their influence on article submissions and journal rankings: An update (2012)Biomedical research platforms…Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals (2012)Best peer reviewers and the q…Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Writing a narrative biomedica…Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics (2011)Diversity, value and limitati…Biomedical journal editing: elements of success (2011)Biomedical journal editing: e…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Biblioshiny and the SAAS Workflow: An integrated framework for transparent and reproducible science mapping. A demonstration through the replication of a study (2026)Biblioshiny and the SAAS Work…A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2021)A bibliometric analysis of CO…TAEKWONDO SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION PUBLISHED ON THE WEB OF SCIENCE (1988-2016): COLLABORATION AND TOPICS (2017)TAEKWONDO SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTI…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Ethical Aspects and Dilemmas of Preparing, Writing and Publishing of the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals (2012)Choosing the Target Journal: Do Authors Need a Comprehensive Approach? (2013)Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation (2008)PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus or Google Scholar – Which is the best search engine for an effective literature research in laser medicine? (2011)A writer’s dilemma: Where to publish and where not to? (2016)Scientist impact factor (SIF): a new metric for improving scientists’ evaluation? (2017)How do I peer-review a scientific article?—a personal perspective (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (2013)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context (2018)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact (2014)What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review (2016)Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology (2020)Protected Health Information on Social Networking Sites: Ethical and Legal Considerations (2011)Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study (2009)Martial arts of the world : an encyclopedia of history and innovation (2010)Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study (2010)Martial Arts and Combat Sports for Youth: A 10-Year Scoping Review (2024)Quantitative Analysis of Food Science Trends (2018)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: How to Choose a Journal? (2020)Social Public Purchasing: Addressing a Critical Void in Public Purchasing Research (2021)Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Duplicate Publication Rate Decline in Korean Medical Journals (2014)Publishing in open access era: focus on respiratory journals. (2014)A Study of Distribution and Growth of Open Access Research Journals Across the World (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2011Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors800 cited
  • 2011Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics178 cited
  • 2012Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals47 cited
  • 2012Indexed journal: What does it mean?47 cited
  • 2012Biomedical research platforms and their influence on article submissions and journal rankings: An update36 cited
  • 2011Biomedical journal editing: elements of success35 cited
  • 2012Social Networks in Medical Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina33 cited
  • 2013Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors at the Forefront of Improving the Quality and Indexing Chances of its Member Journals21 cited

Cited by

  • 2017TAEKWONDO SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION PUBLISHED ON THE WEB OF SCIENCE (1988-2016): COLLABORATION AND TOPICS18 cited
  • 2021A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Latin America and the Caribbean14 cited
  • 2026Biblioshiny and the SAAS Workflow: An integrated framework for transparent and reproducible science mapping. A demonstration through the replication of a study11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work