Looking beyond the importance of life goals. The personal goal model of subjective well-being in neuropsychological rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify subjective importance, attainability and success of life goals and their predictive value for subjective well-being in patients with acquired brain injury. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING: Two inpatient neurological rehabilitation centres. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with non-progressive neurological disorders. INTERVENTIONS: Survey using questionnaires. MEASURES: Life goal characteristics were assessed using a life goal questionnaire (GOALS). Subjective well-being (composite score) was measured using the Center of the Epidemic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients participated in the study. The most important life goals are intimacy (4.59/5), achievement (3.96/5) and altruism (3.89/5). The intimacy goals are considered most attainable (4.19/5) and patients feel most successful in this domain (3.98/5). Two important predictions of the personal goal model of subjective well-being could be confirmed. First, goal attainability moderates the relation between goal importance and goal success. Second, the influence of goal importance on subjective well-being is mediated by experienced success. The most powerful predictors for subjective well-being are success in the achievement domain (beta = 0.404) and discrepancy between importance and success in the intimacy domain (beta = -0.276). CONCLUSIONS: The subjective well-being of neurological patients depends not only on the appraised importance of life goals but also on their attainability and success.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.