Variation in the anthropomorphization of supernatural beings and its implications for cognitive theories of religion.

Andrew Shtulman

76 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Study and Philosophy of Religion Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs

Abstract

The cognitive study of religion has been highly influenced by P. Boyer's (2001, 2003) claim that supernatural beings are conceptualized as persons with counterintuitive properties. The present study tests the generality of this claim by exploring how different supernatural beings are conceptualized by the same individual and how different individuals conceptualize the same supernatural beings. In Experiment 1, college undergraduates decided whether three types of human properties (psychological, biological, physical) could or could not be attributed to two types of supernatural beings (religious, fictional). On average, participants attributed more human properties to fictional beings, like fairies and vampires, than to religious beings, like God and Satan, and they attributed more psychological properties than nonpsychological properties to both. In Experiment 2, 5-year-old children and their parents made both open-ended and closed-ended property attributions. Although both groups of participants attributed a majority of human properties to the fictional beings, children attributed a majority of human properties to the religious beings as well. Taken together, these findings suggest that anthropomorphic theories of supernatural-being concepts, though fully predictive of children's concepts, are only partially predictive of adults' concepts.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 76 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Metaphors We Live By 2003The cultural nature of human development 1979Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.1987The Intentional Stance 2000Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers 1985Conceptual Change in Childhood 1944An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior 2002Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought

Cited by

2014Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose 2012Sociocultural Input Facilitates Children’s Developing Understanding of Extraordinary Minds 2012Paranormal and Religious Believers Are More Prone to Illusory Face Perception than Skeptics and Non‐believers 2017Is God just a big person? Children's conceptions of God across cultures and religious traditions 2015Attributes of God: Conceptual Foundations of a Foundational Belief

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.