SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Simple arithmetic versus intuitive understanding: The case of the impact factor
15 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Simple arithmetic versus intuitive understanding: The case of the impact factor (2011)Simple arithmetic versus intuitive unders…Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010)Towards a new crown indicator…There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization (2010)There are neither “king” nor …Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010)Rivals for the crown: Reply t…Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS (2010)Remaining problems with the “…Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization (2010)Further steps towards an idea…Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance (2010)Caveats for the journal and f…An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-index and some other bibliometric rankings of authors (2009)An axiomatic characterization…Lifting the crown—citation z-score (2007)Lifting the crown—citation z-…Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)Requirements for a cocitation…The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities (2001)The publication-citation matr…Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)Averaging and globalising quo…New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)New bibliometric tools for th…Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors (1995)Improving the accuracy of ins…Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)Relative indicators and relat…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Averages of ratios compared to ratios of averages: Mathematical results (2012)Averages of ratios compared t…Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (1988)An introduction to informetrics (1992)Impact factors can mislead (1996)Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data (2005)The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators (2009)Measures of Clinical Significance (2003)Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators (2012)On the calculation of percentile‐based bibliometric indicators (2012)The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations (2014)Assessing basic research (1983)Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation (2009)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators (2003)Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods (2016)The skewness of science (1992)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists (2011)Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis (2011)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)On the Theory of Scales of Measurement (1946)Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure (1981)Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time (2009)A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS (2010)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications (2011)Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)Meta-assessment of bias in science (2017)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations (2010)Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation (2017)Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 2003Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient786 cited
  • 1995New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications499 cited
  • 1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact448 cited
  • 2010Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations425 cited
  • 2007Lifting the crown—citation z-score274 cited
  • 1995Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors232 cited
  • 2010Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance190 cited
  • 2010Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization146 cited
  • 2010Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff104 cited
  • 2009An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-index and some other bibliometric rankings of authors102 cited
  • 2001The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities60 cited
  • 2010There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization58 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS53 cited
  • 1996Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data28 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2012Averages of ratios compared to ratios of averages: Mathematical results11 cited