The meaning and function of grunt variants in baboons

Drew Rendall A · Robert M. Seyfarth · Dorothy L. Cheney · Michael J. Owren

205 citations0/0 files storedAnimal Behaviour

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Primate Behavior and Ecology Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior Language and cultural evolution

Abstract

Wild baboons Papio cynocephalus ursinus, give tonal, harmonically rich vocalizations, termed grunts, in at least two distinct, behavioural contexts: when about to embark on a move across an open area ('move' grunts); and when approaching mothers and attempting to inspect or handle their young infants ('infant' grunts). Grunts in these two contexts elicit different responses from receivers and appear to be acoustically distinct (Owren et al. 1997 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America101 2951-2963). Differences in responses to grunts in the two contexts may, then, be due to acoustic differences, reflecting at least a rudimentary capacity for referential signalling. Alternatively, responses may differ simply due to differences in the contexts in which the grunts are being produced. We conducted playback experiments to test between these hypotheses. Experiments were designed to control systematically the effects of both context and acoustic features so as to evaluate the role of each in determining responses to grunts. In playback trials, subjects differentiated between putative move and infant grunts. Their responses based only on the acoustic features of grunts were functionally distinct and mirrored their behaviour to naturally occurring move and infant grunts. However, subjects' responses were in some cases also affected by the context in which grunts were presented, and by an interaction between the context and the acoustic features of the grunts. Furthermore, responses to grunts were affected by the relative rank difference between the caller and the subject. These results indicate that baboon grunts can function in rudimentary referential fashion, but that the context in which grunts are produced and the social identity of callers can also affect recipients' responses. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 205 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods 1990How Monkeys See the World 1980Monkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic Communication 1982Baboon Mothers and Infants.1984Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) screams: Representational signalling in the recruitment of agonistic aid 1996Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys 1997The adaptive value of ‘friendships’ to female baboons: experimental and observational evidence 1980Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech

Cited by

2000Cheap talk when interests conflict 2011A rule-of-thumb based on social affiliation explains collective movements in desert baboons 2007Kin-mediated reconciliation substitutes for direct reconciliation in female baboons 2000Proximate factors mediating "contact" calls in adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) and their infants.2016Meaning, intention, and inference in primate vocal communication

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.