SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry
16 references·2 citing·46 second hop
Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry (2011)Does the h index for assessing single pub…Scientific peer review (2011)Scientific peer reviewA Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication? (2011)A Multilevel Modelling Approa…The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review (2009)The manuscript reviewing proc…The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews (2009)The luck of the referee draw:…Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2009)Extent of type I and type II …Analysis of the Hirsch index’s operational properties (2009)Analysis of the Hirsch index’…A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2009)A content analysis of referee…Using the h-index for assessing single publications (2008)Using the h-index for assessi…The state of h index research (2008)The state of h index researchThe Effectiveness of the Peer Review Process: Inter‐Referee Agreement and Predictive Validity of Manuscript Refereeing at Angewandte Chemie (2008)The Effectiveness of the Peer…Selecting manuscripts for a high‐impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)Selecting manuscripts for a h…Generalizing the h- and g-indices (2008)Generalizing the h- and g-ind…Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts (2008)Convergent validity of biblio…What do we know about the h index? (2007)What do we know about the h i…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists (1989)Citations and the evaluation …Evaluating the quality of scientific research papers in entrepreneurship (2021)Evaluating the quality of sci…A comparative study of Ocean Engineering research between China and the world (2015)A comparative study of Ocean …Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach (2012)How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects (2013)Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game (2016)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants (2011)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core (2009)Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner (2011)A review on h-index and its alternative indices (2021)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1960)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (1992)The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy (2010)A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019) (2020)Fi-Index: A New Method to Evaluate Authors Hirsch-Index Reliability (2022)Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1959)Science in Action (1987)Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? (1996)Citation analysis and journal impact factors in ophthalmology and vision science journals (2003)Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? (2003)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)A multidimensional extension to Hirsch’s h-index (2009)The most cited articles in coronary heart disease: A bibliometric analysis between 1970 and 2015 (2016)Cold chain optimisation models: A systematic literature review (2025)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology (2010)How has healthcare research performance been assessed? A systematic review (2011)Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative (2014)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2007What do we know about the h index?671 cited
  • 2011Scientific peer review563 cited
  • 2008The state of h index research396 cited
  • 2008Generalizing the h- and g-indices164 cited
  • 1989Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists101 cited
  • 2008Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts100 cited
  • 2011A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication?82 cited
  • 2009Analysis of the Hirsch index’s operational properties81 cited
  • 2008Using the h-index for assessing single publications75 cited
  • 2008Selecting manuscripts for a high‐impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere73 cited
  • 2008The Effectiveness of the Peer Review Process: Inter‐Referee Agreement and Predictive Validity of Manuscript Refereeing at Angewandte Chemie70 cited
  • 2009The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

54 cited
  • 2009The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews51 cited
  • 2009A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?47 cited
  • 2009Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition32 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015A comparative study of Ocean Engineering research between China and the world9 cited
    • 2021Evaluating the quality of scientific research papers in entrepreneurship8 cited