Comparison of DRO and DRI on rate of suppression of self-injurious behavior.

Hugh D. Tarpley · Stephen R. Schroeder

67 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Behavioral and Psychological Studies Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Psychological Treatments and Assessments

Abstract

Two procedures were used to compare the effects of differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) and differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI) on self-injurious behavior (SIB) of three profoundly retarded head-bangers in a multiple-schedule within-subjects design. We found that rewarding a response specifically incompatible with SIB suppressed it more rapidly than applying DRO without specifying an alternative response. The relationship of collateral behaviors to SIB were dependent upon the repertoires of the individual clients.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 67 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1980The definition, taxonomy, epidemiology, and ecology of self-injurious behavior 1980Chronic ruminative vomiting: A comparison of four treatment procedures 1990The Effect of Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behaviors (DRI) on Pica for Cigarettes in Persons with Intellectual Disability 1983Reducing behavior through reinforcement 1990Positive Approaches to the Treatment of Severe Behavior Problems in Persons with Developmental Disabilities: A Review and Analysis of Reinforcement and Stimulus-Based Procedures. Monograph No. 4.1989Health-Threatening Behaviors

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.