SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review
8 references·6 citing·37 second hop
Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review (2014)Choice of primary outcomes in randomised …Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Standardising outcomes for cl…OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)OMERACT: An international ini…Evaluating Maternity Care: A Core Set of Outcome Measures (2007)Evaluating Maternity Care: A …Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Core outcome domains for chro…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Study design and primary outcome in randomized controlled trials in periodontology. A systematic review (2021)Study design and primary outc…Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study (2018)Development of a core outcome…Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review (2017)Core outcome sets in women's …Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study (2016)Core Outcomes for Colorectal …A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth (2015)A Core Outcome Set for Evalua…The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health (2014)The CROWN Initiative: journal…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference (2010)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. (1998)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? (1994)A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing (2001)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)A core outcome set for pre‐eclampsia research: an international consensus development study (2020)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC): a modified Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for trials in perioperative care and anaesthesia (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 2003Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations3,502 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 2007OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology536 cited
  • 2007Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews482 cited
  • 2007Evaluating Maternity Care: A Core Set of Outcome Measures170 cited

Cited by

  • 2015A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth212 cited
  • 2017Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review166 cited
  • 2016Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study121 cited
  • 2014The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health106 cited
  • 2018Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study92 cited
  • 2021Study design and primary outcome in randomized controlled trials in periodontology. A systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited