Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011

16 references·8 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
2002A CRITICAL APPRAISAL764 cited
2006"Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.269 cited
2011Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview269 cited
2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation263 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007

Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach

252 cited

1996Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology205 cited

2009Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy201 cited

Cited by

2016Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data30 cited
2018The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist23 cited
2013Comparison of Pooled Risk Estimates for Adverse Effects from Different Observational Study Designs: Methodological Overview20 cited
2018The development of search filters for adverse effects of surgical interventions in medline and E mbase20 cited
2019Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews18 cited
2017Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews14 cited
2019Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study11 cited
2023Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses11 cited