SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleQuality of manuscript reviews in nursing research

Susan J. Henly2009

Article2009

Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research

Susan J. Henly · Molly C. Dougherty

36 citations·0/0 files stored·Nursing Outlook

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Scale Development : Theory and Applications 1986Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory 2002Peer review in health sciences 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review 1998US and Non-US Submissions 1999Peer Review in Health Sciences 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?1990The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review

Cited by

2020What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis 2016Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles 2018An overview of assessing the quality of peer review reports of scientific articles 2025Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review 2010Manuscript peer review: A guide for advanced practice nurses 2022Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2011To publish or perish: How to review a manuscriptarticle · 10 shared references 2009A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical researchreview · 10 shared references 2022Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicosarticle · 10 shared references 2006Quality Assessment of Reviewers’ Reports Using a Simple Instrumentarticle · 8 shared references 2019Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic reviewreview · 7 shared references 2006Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studiesother · 7 shared references

Details

Year2009

Typearticle

Published2009-01-01

VenueNursing Outlook

ISSN-L0029-6554

Languageen

Citations36

Files0 public / 0

ShelfAcademic Writing and Publishing

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.outlook.2008.05.006

openalex_workW2118856847

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2011Conceptual Debates and Empirical Evidence About the Peer Review Process for Scholarly Journals

2013A Core-Item Reviewer Evaluation (CoRE) System for Manuscript Peer Review