SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model
16 references·1 citing·34 second hop
The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model (2009)The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Co…Are judges political?: an empirical analysis of the federal judiciary (2007)Are judges political?: an emp…Supreme Court Decision Making (2005)Supreme Court Decision MakingThe Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (2003)The Supreme Court and the att…The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002)The Supreme Court and the Att…Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making (2002)Jurisprudential Regimes in Su…Majority rule or minority will: adherence to precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court (1999)Majority rule or minority wil…The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices (1996)The Influence of Stare Decisi…Designing Social Inquiry (1994)Designing Social InquiryThe Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)The Supreme Court and the Att…Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)Ideological Values and the Vo…Policymaking and Politics in the Federal District Courts (1985)Policymaking and Politics in …Policymaking and Politics in the Federal District Courts (1984)Policymaking and Politics in …Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978 (1981)Personal Attribute Models of …Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited (1975)Voting Behavior on the United…The Judicial Mind: Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. (1966)The Judicial Mind: Attitudes …The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937-1947, by C. Herman Pritchett (1949)The Roosevelt Court: A Study …Speaking Up: Women and Dissenting Behavior in the Supreme Court of Canada (2020)Speaking Up: Women and Dissen…The Nature of the Judicial Process (1922)Taking Rights Seriously (1977)The Norm of Stare Decisis (1996)What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making (2001)A theory of data. (1960)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Handbook of social psychology (1990)Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts (1997)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Taking Rights Seriously (1978)The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court (2006)Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court (2007)High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil (2012)The Judicial Common Space (2007)The Handbook of Organizational Economics (2013)A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States (2017)Governing with Judges (2000)Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)Judicial Review in New Democracies (2003)Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State (1992)Elaborating the “New Institutionalism” (2009)Symbolic Politics (1993)The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression (1993)Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress (1999)International Norm Dynamics and Political Change (1998)Social Theory of International Politics (1999)Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research (2008)A General Theory of Domination and Justice (2010)Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective (2016)When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures (2011)Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues? (2014)The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Designing Social Inquiry7,221 cited
  • 2002The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited1,172 cited
  • 1993The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model979 cited
  • 2003The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited857 cited
  • 1989Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices731 cited
  • 2005Supreme Court Decision Making455 cited
  • 2007Are judges political?: an empirical analysis of the federal judiciary413 cited
  • 1981Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978303 cited
  • 2002Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making293 cited
  • 1996The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices199 cited
  • 1975Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited183 cited
  • 1966The Judicial Mind: Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963.156 cited
  • 1999Majority rule or minority will: adherence to precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court134 cited
  • 1984Policymaking and Politics in the Federal District Courts122 cited
  • 1949The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937-1947, by C. Herman Pritchett

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

112 cited
  • 1985Policymaking and Politics in the Federal District Courts101 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Speaking Up: Women and Dissenting Behavior in the Supreme Court of Canada10 cited