No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
In this commentary, I discuss the empirically validated treatments movement from the perspective of a practitioner and educator. I review the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 12 Task Force report (APA, 1995) on empirically validated treatments, its effects, and its critics. I also consider the APA Division 29 Task Force report (Norcross, 2001) on empirically supported therapy relationships and Westen and Morrison's (2001) metaanalysis of a set of efficacy studies. After highlighting the dilemmas that the empirically validated treatments movement creates for practitioners, I discuss how the endeavor of clinical practice differs from that of science and close by considering the definition of evidence-based practice adopted by the Institute of Medicine (2001).
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 91 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.